TRIBULATIONS

Re: G.T.  v  Gemstar,  @   Tribunals since 2/7/03

FALSE PROCESSES AND INSTRUMENTS FROM INCEPT OF CASE:
The process at both the ET and EAT have set aside the essence of case with intent. ET proceeded to full Hearing (27/1/04), without Due process followed. Even the Hearing notification was posted by ET to Applicant as Hearing was about to commence (!) being in violation of its own Procedure (notification delivered at least 14 days prior to Hearing), to Article 6 ECoHR and Principle Ruling in Hendrikman And Another where the European Court ruled that "Judgement obtained in ignorance is not enforceable".  Hearing of 27/1/04 was a False Process that created a False Order resulting to a  Strike Out and Legal Costs of £7,400 that have been supported since in contempt and abuse of the law.  

A Review took place on 27/8/04, where the same ET panel supported their own Decision and this in total violation to Article 6 ECoHR which clearly states that Judges should NOT sit on the Appeal / Review in the same case as they had decided, as this deprives impartiality and independence.  Further to the above violations, Applicant's Submissions were Suppressed in an attempt to reinfornce decision for legal costs obtained under collusion and fraud as well as denial and abduction of rights.

EMBROILED IN CONTEMPT AND ABUSE OF THE LAW:
At the EAT Appeal, these were contested under the Zincroft case for collusion and fraud as well as denial and abduction of Applicant's rights. False Processes continued with further suppression / contempt of evidence creating further false Orders on 16/11/04, 21/12/04 and 3/3/05, in support of ET's False Processes and Orders and an abundance of false instruments were embeded in the correspondences with all three institutions.

The above are in contempt and abuse of the law. Furher contempt of the law has been EAT's ignorance of its own Rule 6.6 which states "The EAT will not retain bundles from a case heard at a PH"  yet, for this case, the EAT refuses their return and instead demands apprx £400 in copy charges for one of the bundles.This amounts to a further abuse of Rules and Procedures and further denial and abduction of Rights with intent and in Contempt and Abuse of the Law.

REALMS OF THE TERRORIST ACT 2001:
Respondents attempted to divert case (19/10/04)-in trying to alleviate responsibilities from essence of case-from the Appeal process at the EAT  to the County Court to enforce fraudulant legal costs under the false processes and instruments of the Tribunals, thus enforcing this "sentence" within the realms of The Terrorist Act 2001.

APPARENT COLLUSION:
There was apparent collusion (Ref. BCCAppl.21/4/05-Pg2 pt.6) amongst the institutions involved in this case.

IRREGULARITIES AT LEGAL INSTITUTIONS UNSUPERVISED:
As a result of the many irregularities within this case, as mentioned above and this with the knowledge of the Lord Chancellor; the Home Secretary and The DTI Minister (since 22/10/04) contravenes the whole process of justice and evident lack of controls in the supervision of the Judiciary. It is is apparent that the Judiciary are not adequately controlled or supervised, therefore justice is eluded.

CORPORATE WORLD PROMINANCE:
The Corporate World, particularly the more influential attain a prominent role, and are in a position to dictate the pace and be in control, with no respect to ethical conduct or legal standards.  Wrong doings of Respondents were ignored by the Tribunals/Court  including Contempt of Process, providing Perjure Witness Statements, Aiding & Abetted Collusion & Fraud as well as being in Contempt in a previous employment case in the same year.

LEGAL WRONGDOINGS WITH INTENT AND WITHOUT DUE CAUSE:
Applicant and her case have been subjected with intent and without due cause, to continued  Discrimination, Victimisation, Frustration,  Aiding and Abetting, Denial & Abduction of Rights, Suppression of information/evidence, Collusion & Fraud, False Processes & False Instruments.   Action by relevant authorities is still pending amid all wrong doings, and unfortunately such inaction does not abide/support  Justice and Public Interest.

THIS PROCESS DEFEATS JUSTICE :
Despite this case being a Civil one, through the creation of  a string of False Process and False Instruments, at the Tribunals and the County Court, it has turned to one embroiled in criminality. In view of blatant Contempt and Abuse of the Law with intent by various participants, this in itself, is against public interest that also defeats the purpose of Justice.